Venue:Virtual. Winning advocacy involves changing minds. Understanding how minds work therefore gives an advocate a significant competitive edge. In this webinar, leading academics and practitioners will discuss the psychology behind effective oral advocacy with reference to scientific research. Which legally irrelevant human factors influence judicial and arbitral decisions? How can cognitive biases impact decision-makers? How do stories and metaphors influence decision-making? Which submissions capture attention and why? Speakers include: Doak Bishop, King and Spalding; Dr. Ula Cartwright-Finch, Managing Director and Scientist, Cortex Capital; Jennifer K. Robbennolt, Co-director, Illinois Program on Law, Behavior and Social Science, University of Illinois College of Law; Sabina Sacco, ‎Independent Arbitrator, ‎Sabina Sacco Arbitration; with Moderators Simon Batifort, Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle, and Dr. Remy Gerbay,MoloLamken. For more information and to register, please consult the following link: https://curtis-law.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_f5lFNEtKSiC1-uvooZAN4Q.